Petitioner sought directions to implement a notification regarding registration of e-rickshaws in Howrah. The Court noted a prior order and pending contempt petition, holding repeated PILs unnecessary for the same issue.
Null
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION
(Appellate Side)
WPA (P) 202 of 2021
(Through Video Conference)
Reserved on: 06.12.2021 Pronounced on: 13.12.2021
Rama Prasad Sarkar
...Petitioner
-Vs-
The State of West Bengal and Others
...Respondents
| Present:- | |
|---|---|
| Mr. Rama Prasad Sarkar | |
| Mr. Amal Kr. Sen, Ms. Ashima Das (Sil), Advocates |
|
| Mr. Arijit Dey, Advocate |
| ... Petitioner-in-Person |
|---|
| ... for the State |
| ... for the Resondent Nos. 2 & 3 |
Coram: THE HON’BLE JUSTICE PRAKASH SHRIVASTAVA, CHIEF JUSTICE
THE HON’BLE JUSTICE RAJARSHI BHARADWAJ, JUDGE
Prakash Shrivastava, CJ:
(PRAKASH SHRIVASTAVA) CHIEF JUSTICE
(RAJARSHI BHARADWAJ) JUDGE
Kolkata 13.12.2021
PA(RB)
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court should entertain the present Public Interest Litigation regarding registration of e-rickshaws given a prior order and pending contempt petition.
Whether repeated petitions are permissible for the same subject matter after a requisite order has been passed.
Rama Prasad Sarkar
The State of West Bengal
Prakash Shrivastava
Rajarshi Bharadwaj
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
