Dismissed

Prof. (Dr.) Pankaj Kr Mandal v. State of West Bengal & Ors.

Calcutta HC19 Mar 2021WPA/20179/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Judicature at Calcutta dismissed four pending writ petitions as withdrawn. The Court held that all interim orders stand vacated and disposed of connected applications. It directed the return of service books to one respondent within a week.

What did the court decide?

Disposal of connected applications; direction to return service books to respondent no. 8.

Prof. (Dr.) Pankaj Kr Mandal Vs State of West… — Writ and Judicial Review | Calcutta HC (2021)

¶1

16^th November, 2021 (D/L No.1) (SKB)

¶2

W.P.A. 20178 of 2019

¶3

Prof.(Dr.)Srimanta Sinha Roy Versus State of West Bengal & Ors.

¶4

With

¶5

W.P.A. 20179 of 2019

¶6

(1A No. CAN 2/2021 )

¶7

Prof. (Dr.) Pankaj Kr. Mandal Versus State of West Bengal & Ors.

¶8

With

¶9

W.PA. 23565 of 2019

¶10

(IA No. CAN 1/2021)

¶11

Prof. Seimanta Sinha Roy Versus State of West Bengal & ors.

¶12

With

¶13

W.P.A 23567 of 2019

¶14

(IA No. CAN 1/2021)

¶15

Prof. Pankaj Kumar Mandal Versus State of West Bengal & Ors.

¶16

Mr. Sudarsan Halder, Mr. Aniruddha Ghosh …for the applicant/ Resp. No.7 (In item nos. 1 to 4). Mr. Amiya Kr. Dutta Mr. Swadesh Priya Ghosh …for the petitioner in all matters.

¶17

Mr. Sirsanya Bandopadhya, Mr. Arka Kumar Nag … for the State (item no.1).

¶18

Mr. Tapan Kr. Mukherjee, Mr. Rabindra Narayan Dutta, Mr. Hare Krishna Halder …for the State respondent (Item No. 2).

¶19

¶20

Mr. Lalit Mohan Mahata, Mr. Prasanta behari Mahata …for the State respondent ( Item no.3 & 4).

¶21

Mr. Pulak Ranjan Mondal Ms. Bandana Mondal Mr. Subhrangsu Panda …for the W.B.C.S.C. Mr. Anil Kr. Gupta …for the UGC(Item no. 1 to 4).

¶22

Mr. Santanu Chatterjee ..for the UOI ( Item No. 1 to 4). Mr. D. Pattanayak

¶23

… for respondent no.8(item no.4). Ms. Nandini Mitra … for West Bengal State University (item nos.1 to 4). Mr. Subhrojyoti Bhowmick … for respondent no.8 (item no.1).

¶24

The petitioners in four of the writ petitions mentioned in the order dated 6^th April, 2021 seeks to withdraw the said writ petitions. Material respondents are present.

¶25

In view of the submissions made by the writ petitioners in the presence of the respondents, W.P.A 20178 of 2019, W.P.A. 20179 of 2019, W.P.A.23565 of 2019 and W.P.A. 23567 of 2019 are dismissed as withdrawn.

¶26

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that a contempt application filed by the petitioners in respect of an order related to these writ petitions shall not be proceeded with. He, therefore,

¶27

¶28

seeks leave to mention the matter as and when the matter is listed before the appropriate Bench.

¶29

Leave is granted.

¶30

Since all the writ petitions have been dismissed as withdrawn, all interim orders stand vacated and all connected applications are disposed of.

¶31

Learned counsel appearing for respondent no.7 submits that all the relevant service books shall be returned to respondent no.8.

¶32

Accordingly, learned Counsel appearing for respondent no.7 is directed to return all the relevant service books to respondent no.8 in course of the week.

¶33

Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be made available to the parties upon compliance with the requisite formalities.

¶34

(Moushumi Bhattacharya, J.)

Prof. (Dr.) Pankaj Kr Mandal v. State of West Bengal & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Prof. (Dr.) Pankaj Kr Mandal v. State of West Bengal & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Gautam Maity Vs State of West Bengal

Anjula Nagpal & Ors. Vs Aba Builders Limited & Ors.

Ruchi Singh Deo Alias Ishvari Raje Singh Deo & Ors. Vs Maheshwari Debi @ Singh

Prof Pankaj Kumar Mandal Vs State of West Bengal & Ors.

Prof Seimanta Sinha Roy Vs State of West Bengal & Ors.

Prof. (Dr.) Srimanta Sinha Roy Vs State of West Bengal & Ors.