Uma Prasad Naskar v. the Chariman, Wbsedcl and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Court. No. 33 Suvayan/ Sourav WPA 14752 of…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
S/L 23 30.04.2025 Court. No. 33 Suvayan/ Sourav
WPA 14752 of 2021
Uma Prasad Naskar Vs.
The Chairman, W.B.S.E.D.C.L. & Ors.
Mr. Apurba Kumar Dutta Mr. K. Banerjee
…for the petitioner.
Mr. Sujit Sankar Koley
…for W.B.S.E.D.C.L.
- The supplementary affidavit filed on behalf of the writ petitioner be taken on record. The copy of the same has been served upon the learned advocate representing the respondents/W.B.S.E.D.C.L.
- The learned advocate representing the respondents/W.B.S.E.D.C.L. seeks further time to file affidavit-in-opposition and the same is allowed.
- Let the matter be fixed on May 14, 2025 for filing affidavit-in-opposition as a last chance.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Uma Prasad Naskar
- respondent
The Chairman, W.B.S.E.D.C.L.
Coram
Ananya Bandyopadhyay
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Calcutta HC
- Decided on
- · November
- Registered
- Case no.
- WPA/14752/2021
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court