This order records the absence of the statutory successor to a deceased petitioner. The High Court dismissed the writ petition as not pressed based on instructions from the petitioner's wife, who expressed no desire to continue the litigation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
01 03.08.2021 . d.p.
In The High Court At Calcutta Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction Appellate Side
W.P.A 11736 of 2018 (Via Video Conference)
Dr. Rajesh Karmakar -versus State of West Bengal & Ors.
Mr. Nayan Chand Bihani, Ms. Papiya Banerjee Bihani, Mr. Soumyajit Ghosh. …For the Petitioner.
Mr. Anil Kumar Gupta. …For the UGC.
The learned advocate appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that Dr. Rajesh Karmakar that is the writ petitioner herein has expired. His wife has given a written communication to the learned advocate intimating her desire not to proceed with the writ petition.
In view of such submission, W.P.A. 11736 of 2018 stands dismissed as ‘not pressed’.
The instruction given by the wife of the deceased petitioner to the learned advocate is taken on record.
Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties on completion of usual formalities.
( Amrita Sinha, J.)
Dr. Rajesh Karmakar (via wife)
State of West Bengal
Amrita Sinha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
