Partly allowed

Nursama Bibi & Ors. v. Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. & Ors.

Calcutta HC4 Aug 2021FMAT/36/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A revision application for condonation of delay under M.A.C. Case No. 45 of 2010 and an appeal regarding quantum of compensation and interest were disposed of. The appeal was allowed in principle with the interest rate on the awarded compensation reduced from 8% to 6% per annum, with the respondent ordered to pay the balance interest after depositing the principal claimed.

What did the court decide?

Appeal allowed in principle; modification to interest rate made; respondent directed to pay interest on awarded amount.

Nursama Bibi & Ors. Vs Oriental Insurance Company Ltd… — Money Laundering | Calcutta HC (2021)

¶1

22 04.8.2021 Sc

¶2

(Via Video Conference)

¶3

F.M.A.T 36 OF 2017

¶4

with

¶5

I.A. No. CAN 1 OF 2021

¶6

--------------

¶7

Nursama Bibi & Ors.

¶8

Vs.

¶9

Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. & Ors.

¶10

Mr. Muktakesh Das

¶11

…For the Appellants/ Claimants.

¶12

Ms. Gopa Das Mukherjee

¶13

…For the Respondent/ Insurance Co. Ltd.

¶14

I.A. No. CAN 1 OF 2021

¶15

This is an application for condonation of delay in filing the instant appeal.

¶16

On perusal of the pleadings, this Court is satisfied that cause shown for delay in filing of the appeal is sufficient and prayer for condonation of delay should be allowed.

¶17

Accordingly, the application for condonation of delay being CAN 1 of 2021 stands allowed.

¶18

The application for condonation of delay is disposed

¶19

of.

¶20

F.M.A.T 36 OF 2017

¶21

The instant appeal is directed against the judgement and order dated 7^th April 2014 passed by the learned District & Sessions Judge, 2^nd Court, Nadia at Krishnanagar in the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal and

¶22

¶23

the said order and judgement was corrected on 30^th May, 2016 by the said MAC Tribunal in M.A.C. Case No. 45 of 2010 in a claim under Section 163A of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 for the death of one “Jamal Sk.” in a road accident dated 28.01.2010.

¶24

The appeal has been preferred by the claimants/appellants primarily on the ground that the tribunal has erred in computing the compensation and the awarded interest which has not been deposited by the respondent/Insurance Company.

¶25

Various points have been raised by the appellants/claimants in the instant appeal challenging the quantum of compensation. It is submitted on behalf of the appellants/claimants that the monthly income of Rs.3,000/- of the deceased as considered by the learned Judge was inadequate. Accordingly, it was argued that a lesser quantum of compensation has been wrongfully awarded by the tribunal.

¶26

Per contra , learned Advocate representing the Insurance Company argues that the award is just and reasonable and there is no further scope of enhancement of the same.

¶27

Accordingly, after considering the submissions as advanced by advocate appearing on behalf of the parties, the impugned award is upheld and only the rate of interest is modified from 8% per annum to 6% per annum.

¶28

¶29

The appellants/claimants acknowledge receipt of the entire awarded amount of Rs.4,17,500/-. The balance interest amount on the awarded amount of Rs.4,17,500/@ 6% per annum from the date of filing of the claim application till the deposit of the awarded amount in the tribunal would become payable to the appellants/claimants within a period of 45 days from the date of receipt of the bank accounts’ particulars of the claimants. Advocate for appellants/claimants will forward the bank accounts’ details of the appellants/claimants within a fortnight from date to the advocate for the Insurance Company. The payment shall be made in the proportion as decided by the court below.

¶30

With the aforesaid directions, the instant appeal is disposed of.

¶31

There shall be no order as to cost.

¶32

The Registry is directed to send down the lower court records at once, if received by this time.

¶33

Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties upon compliance of all formalities, on priority basis.

¶34

(Shekhar B. Saraf, J.)

Nursama Bibi & Ors. v. Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nursama Bibi & Ors. v. Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Babita Basu Roy Vs State of West Bengal & Ors.

Golden Transport Agency Vs State

Golden Transport Agency Vs State

Paramita Bhowmik & Anr. Vs United India Insurance Co. Ltd. & Anr.

Bandana Majhi & Ors. Vs the Br. Manager, Cholamandalam Ms General Insurance Co. Ltd.

Alpana Maity & Anr. Vs National Insurance Co. Ltd. & Anr.