Restoration application CAN 1 of 2021 filed by appellant Subarna Barman for recall of his dismissed appeal FMAT 296 of 2020 was dismissed for default as he was present but unrepresented without prayer for accommodation.
Application for restoration dismissed for default; no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
04.04.2022 SL No.59 Court No.8 (gc)
FMAT 296 of 2020 With CAN 1 of 2021
Sri Subarna Barman Vs. Smt. Nabanita Mandal (Maity)
The appellant is not represented nor any accommodation is prayed for even in the second call.
The appeal was dismissed for default on 6th July, 2021.
This is an application, being CAN 1 of 2021, for restoration by recalling of the said order.
Even today, the appellant is not represented.
Under such circumstances, the application being CAN 1 of 2021 stands dismissed for default.
However, there shall be no order as to costs.
(Ajoy Kumar Mukherjee, J.) (Soumen Sen, J.)
Sri Subarna Barman
Smt. Nabanita Mandal (Maity)
Ajoy Kumar Mukherjee
Soumen Sen
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
