This order dismissed a restoration application (CAN 2 of 2022) for default as no one appeared in support. No costs were awarded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
303 03.04. FMAT 188 of 2018 2024 IA No. CAN 1 of 2018 (Old No. CAN 2571 of 2018) IA No. CAN 2 of 2022
Ct. No. 04
ab
The Divisional Railway Manager, Kharagpur Divison Vs. Sri Bhabatosh Maity.
Mr. Ramdulal Manna, Ms. Manju Manna (Dey), Mr. Sabyasachi Mondal, Mr. Sayan Mukherjee. ... for the respondent.
Re: CAN 2 of 2022
No one appears in support of the instant application, when the matter is called on. The respondent is represented.
In view of the above, the application for restoration being CAN 2 of 2022 is dismissed for default.
There shall, however, be no order as to costs.
(Harish Tandon, J.)
(Madhuresh Prasad, J.)
2
The Divisional Railway Manager, Kharagpur Divison
Sri Bhabatosh Maity
Harish Tandon
Madhuresh Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
