Pradip Ray v. Kashinath Roy & Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
rrc FMAT 135 of 2017 with IA No. CAN 1 of…
rrc FMAT 135 of 2017 with IA No. CAN 1 of…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
6 16.11.2021 rrc
FMAT 135 of 2017 with IA No. CAN 1 of 2018 (Old No. CAN 4110 of 2018)
(Shri Pradip Ray Vs. Sri Kashinath Roy & Anr.)
Nobody appears on behalf of the appellant on earlier
occasion.
Today, when the matter is posted as “For Orders”, the
appellant is unrepresented.
Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for default.
The connected application is also dismissed.
(Bivas Pattanayak, J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)
Shri Pradip Ray
Sri Kashinath Roy & Anr.
Pattanayak
Bagchi
Javed Ahmed KM
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court