The court acknowledged that the underlying suit was dismissed and an appeal against that dismissal is pending. Consequently, the current appeal was dismissed as infructuous.
The appeal was dismissed as infructuous. The charge sheet under CAN 1 of 2017 was also dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
11.11.2021
2
sdas Ct. No. 15
FMAT 108 of 2017 with CAN 1 of 2017 (Old No. CAN 907 of 2017)
Shreelekha Sarda Vs. Sushil Kumar Tapuriah & Ors.
Mr. Jayanta Sengupta Mr. Sagnik Basu Mr. Subhrojyoti Dey …..For the appellant
Appeal has been rendered infructuous as the suit has already been dismissed and an appeal being FAT 572 of 2017 has been preferred against such dismissal which is pending before this Court.
Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed as infructuous. In view of dismissal of the appeal, CAN 1 of 2017 (Old No. CAN 907 of 2017) also stands dismissed.
(Bivas Pattanayak, J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)
Shreelekha Sarda
Sushil Kumar Tapuriah
Bivas Pattanayak
Joymalya Bagchi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
