Appeal dismissed for failure to pay deficit court fees despite prior liberty, leaving no point in keeping it pending.
Appeal dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
28 08.12. FMAT 1014 of 2015 2021
Ct. No. 04
Ab
Smt. Rukshini Shaw Vs.
Sri Nittam Sen and another.
We have perused the office note dated 29th November 2021 indicating that despite liberty was granted to put in the deficit Court Fees, the deficit Court Fees has not been put in by the appellant.
In view of the order dated 15th November 2021,
there is no point in keeping the appeal pending.
Accordingly, the instant appeal is dismissed.
(Harish Tandon, J.)
(Rabindranath Samanta, J.)
2
Smt. Rukshini Shaw
Sri Nittam Sen
Harish Tandon
Rabindranath Samanta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
