MD Akbar v. Union of India
Case brief
What is this about?
2011 With IA No.:CRAN 3 of 2013 (Old No.:…
2011 With IA No.:CRAN 3 of 2013 (Old No.:…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
04.10.2021 S/L-115 Ct-39 (AD)
C.R.R. 582 of 2011 With IA No.:CRAN 3 of 2013 (Old No.: CRAN 2418 of 2013) With IA No.:CRAN 9 of 2015 (Old No.:CRAN 3446 of 2015)
In the matter of: Md. Akbar
… petitioner Ms. Sanchita Chaudhuri
… for the petitioner.
Learned Advocate-on-record appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the petitioner would not like to press this application.
Written instruction given by the petitioner to the learned Advocate-on-record to this effect as filed in Court be taken on record.
Accordingly, the revisional application and connected applications are dismissed as withdrawn.
Urgent photostat certified copies of this order may be delivered to the learned Advocates for the parties, if applied for, upon compliance of all formalities.
(Jay Sengupta, J.)
Md. Akbar
Ms. Sanchita Chaudhuri
Jay Sengupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court