Disposed

MD Munna v. State of West Bengal

Calcutta HC3 Mar 2021CRR/482/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

On a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C., the Single Judge directed the trial court to effectively utilize scheduled dates for evidence collection, assist parties to avoid adjournments, and schedule shorter dates where possible to ensure timely disposal of the pending NDPS trial where the petitioner is in custody.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the trial court to ensure expeditious disposal by utilizing scheduled dates for evidence collection without unnecessary adjournments and giving short dates to the accused in custody.

MD Munna Vs State of West Bengal — Narcotics (NDPS) | Calcutta HC (2021)

¶1

03.03.2021 Item no.8 Ct. No.42 CHC

¶2

C.R.R. No.482 of 2021 (Physical Hearing)

¶3

In Re: An application under Section 482 read with Section 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

In the matter of:-

Ms. Sonali Das

….for the petitioner

Mr. Saswata Gopal Mukherji, Ld. P.P. Mr. Partha Pratim Das, Ms. Aindreela Chakraborty

¶8

The Court is approached under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for a direction to ensure expeditious disposal of a pending NDPS case of learned Additional Sessions Judge, 6^th Court, Barasat, under Section 21(c) of N.D.P.S. Act vide case No.N-4/2019.

¶9

Ms. Das, learned advocate representing the petitioner submits that even after framing charge long before, there has been no substantial progress in the trial recording evidence for the purpose, and as a result of which petitioner being in custody is unnecessarily made to face undue hardship. The delay thus caused in the progress of the trial is the one and only ground in support of the prayer for expeditious disposal.

¶10

¶11

Admittedly, petitioner is in custody since 27^th December, 2018 for the alleged recovery of the contraband, which is above the commercial quantity.

¶12

Mr. Partha Pratim Das, learned advocate representing the State submits that the charge in this case has already been framed and the court has already scheduled dates for collection of evidence of witnesses, as already cited in the chargesheet.

¶13

It is contended by the State that because of the pandemic, that already surfaced the entire country, the ordinary function of the Court has largely been disturbed. The onset of COVID 19, according to State, has to be kept in view so as to make proper consideration of the prayer for expeditious disposal.

¶14

Having considered the rival submission of the parties, the Court is of the view that the instant revisional application may be disposed of, so as to subserve the purpose of justice, as proposed to be obtained, giving direction mentioned as hereunder.

¶15

The learned court below is directed to make effective utilization of the dates so far scheduled for collection of evidence taking support and cooperation from either of the parties to this case, aiming at ensuring expeditious disposal, without granting unnecessary adjournment, unless it is extremely unavoidable.

¶16

The Court makes it clarified that since the accused is in custody, sincere and honest endeavour is expected to be put by the learned court below, while scheduling the dates for collection of evidence giving short dates to the extent possible, subject to the congestion of similar nature of cases pending in his Court.

¶17

¶18

With this direction/observation, the instant revisional application stands disposed of.

¶19

All parties shall act in terms of copy of this order downloaded from the official website of this Court.

¶20

Urgent Xerox certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties, subject to compliance with all requisite formalities.

¶21

(Subhasis Dasgupta, J.)

MD Munna v. State of West Bengal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

MD Munna v. State of West Bengal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pritiman Mitra and Ors. Vs State of West Bengal and Anr.

Rahul Kuddus Molla Vs State of West Bengal

Sk. Hasan @ Subho Vs State of West Bengal

Kalimuddin Ahmmed Vs State of West Bengal

Satish Chandra Dubey Vs State of West Bengal and Anr.

Sk. Raju Vs State of West Bengal