Petitioner sought withdrawal of a non-pressed revisional application with liberty to file afresh. Court dismissed the application as not pressed while directing return of certified order copies.
Application dismissed as not pressed; liberty granted to file revision afresh; certified copies of orders directed to be returned.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
07 02.03.2021 NB
CRR 359 of 2021
In the matter of:- Hartej Singh …petitioner
Mr. Sabir Ahmed, Mr. Alokesh Dalai. …for the petitioner.
Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that there some incurable defects in the revision petition filed on behalf of the petitioner. In view of the same, the petitioner would like to withdraw this application with liberty to file an application afresh on the selfsame grounds.
On the prayer of the learned Counsel for the petitioner, the revisional application is dismissed as not pressed. However, this shall not preclude the petitioner from filing a revisional application afresh on the selfsame grounds.
On the prayer of the learned Counsel for the petitioner, the Criminal Section is directed to return the certified copy of the orders annexed to the petition to the learned Advocate on record of the petitioner upon furnishing a photostat copy of the orders and on giving usual undertakings.
Urgent photostat certified copy of this order may be supplied to the parties expeditiously, if applied for.
(Jay Sengupta, J.)
Hartej Singh
Jay Sengupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
