Dismissed
Archana Batabyal v. Sukhen Batabyal & Anr.
Calcutta HCCRR/3328/2007
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
Video Conference) CRR 3328 of 2007 In the…
What the court decided
AI extract
Video Conference) CRR 3328 of 2007 In the…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
02.08.2021 79
ss (via Video Conference) CRR 3328 of 2007
In the matter of: Archana Batabyal
… Petitioner.
Mr. Sabyasachi Banerjee
… for the State
This matter has been called on several days and none has appeared on behalf of the petitioner. No accommodation has been prayed for. When the matter was called on today, none has appeared on behalf of the petitioner.
Accordingly, this matter is dismissed for default and connected applications, if any, are also dismissed. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
The department concerned is directed to communicate the order passed in Court today to the Court below. The department shall ensure that acknowledgement of receipt of their communication is received. Report of compliance to be placed before this Court after three weeks.
The lower Court is directed to expeditiously act in accordance with law.
(Shekhar B. Saraf, J.)
Archana Batabyal
The State
Shekhar B. Saraf
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court