Disposed

Samim Sarkar @ Tunty v. the State of West Bengal and Anr.

Calcutta HC15 Mar 2021CRR/33/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Calcutta High Court disposed of a revisional application under Sections 397/401/482 CrPC without touching upon merits or prejudice to rights. The Court directed the lower court to effectively utilize the fixed date for consideration of the charge.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the learned court below to effectively utilize the date fixed for consideration of the charge, if not utilized, to fix a new date three weeks thereafter peremptorily.

Samim Sarkar @ Tunty Vs the State of West Bengal and Anr. — Quashing and FIR | Calcutta HC (2021)

¶1

15.03.2021 Item no.17 Ct. No.2 CHC

¶2

CALCUTTA HIGH COURT IN THE CIRCUIT BENCH AT JALPAIGURI APPELLATE JUISDICTION (Physical Hearing)

¶3

C.R.R. No.33 of 2020

¶4

In Re:- An application under Sections 397/401 read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

¶5

In the matter of:-

¶6

Samim Sarkar @ Tunty …..petitioner

¶7

Mr. Subhasish Misra

¶8

….for the petitioner

¶9

Mr. A. S. Chakraborty, Ld. A.P.P. Mr. Nilay Chakraborty

¶10

….for the State

¶11

This is for quashing of proceeding in connection with Sessions Case No.80(12) of 2018 under Sections 448/376/323/506 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶12

Learned advocate Mr. Subhasish Misra, representing the petitioner submits that the medical evidence has already ruled out the possibility of having subjected the petitioner/victim to sexual assault. Upon taking such point, the learned advocate for the petitioner proposes that the allegation raised against the petitioner is without any basis, and there is no justification to continue with the proceeding any more, and if such proceeding is

¶13

¶14

allowed to be continued, there will be an abuse of the process of the court.

¶15

Mr. Nilay Chakraborty, learned advocate representing the State submits that when chargesheet has already been submitted citing as many as 17 witnesses and thereupon court has already fixed date for consideration of the charge, the prayer for quashing should not be allowed at this stage.

¶16

The point so raised, may be raised at the time of making consideration of the charge before the learned court below, and if any such point is raised, the same shall be duly addressed to by the learned court below, and learned court below shall be free to decide the issue in accordance with the provisions of the law, providing sufficient opportunity of hearing to either of the parties to this case.

¶17

Since the court has already fixed date on 29^th April, 2021, let there be direction directing the learned court below to make effective utilization of the date so far fixed for making consideration of charge, and if for any reasons whatsoever, the same could not be utilized, a date for making consideration of the charge may be fixed three weeks thereafter peremptorily.

¶18

It is clarified that this case is disposed of without touching upon the merits of the case and without prejudice to the rights and contentions of petitioner in the matter.

¶19

With this direction/observation, the instant revisional application stands disposed of.

¶20

¶21

Urgent Xerox certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties, subject to compliance with all requisite formalities.

¶22

(Subhasis Dasgupta, J.)

Samim Sarkar @ Tunty v. the State of West Bengal and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Samim Sarkar @ Tunty v. the State of West Bengal and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ashok Sha Vs State of West Bengal and Anr.

Prasenjit Das Vs Koushik Das

Rakesh Rai and Anr. Vs the State of West Bengal

Devendra Kumar Saxena Vs Superintendent of Police , Central Bureau of Investigation (Cbi)

Ram Chandra Agarwal Vs State of West Bengal and Ors.