Vikrant Wadhwa v. State of West Bengal and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Ct. No. 32 CRR 327 of 2021 In the matter of…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
22 15.03.2021 CRR 327 of 2021 NB Ct. No. 32 In the matter of:- Vikrant Wadhwa …petitioner Mr. Rochit Lakhmani, Mr. Mohammed Amin, Mr. Ghulam Muztaba. …for the petitioner. Mr. Swapan Banerjee, Ms. Purnima Ghosh. …for the State. Mr. Pradip Kumar Kundu, Mr. Tapodip Gupta. …for the OP No.2.
Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the petitioner would not like to press this application and would, instead, like to raise all the points taken up in this application before the learned Trial Court at an appropriate stage, if such an occasion arises.
Accordingly, the revisional application is disposed of as not pressed.
Urgent photostat certified copy of this order may be supplied to the parties expeditiously, if applied for.
(Jay Sengupta, J.)
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Vikrant Wadhwa
- respondent
State
- respondent
OP No.2
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Calcutta HC
- Decided on
- · March
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRR/327/2021
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court