This Court dismissed the revisional application (C.R.R. 2912 of 2008) filed by petitioner Rithik Bhattacharya, who was present in-person, for default due to non-appearance of his counsel.
Revisional application dismissed for default; department to communicate order and report compliance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
244 16.8 akb 2021
C.R.R. 2912 of 2008 (Via Video Conference)
Ct. No. 26
In the matter of : Rithik Bhattacharya @ Rithvik Bhattacharjee ….Petitioner
Ms. Sujata Das …for the State.
This revisional application has been called on several days and none has appeared on behalf of the petitioner. No accommodation has been prayed for. When the matter was called on today, none has appeared on behalf of the petitioner.
Accordingly, the revisional application is dismissed for default and connected applications, if any, are also dismissed. Interim order, if any stands vacated.
The department concerned is directed to communicate the order passed in Court today to the Court below. The department shall ensure that acknowledgement of receipt of their communication is received. Report of compliance to be placed before this Court after three weeks.
The lower Court is directed to act expeditiously in accordance with law.
( Shekhar B. Saraf, J. )
Rithik Bhattacharya
Ms. Sujata Das
Shekhar B. Saraf
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
