The Hon'ble Court dismissed a revisional application as not pressed by the learned counsel for the petitioner on the date of hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
04.03.2021 7 SB Ct. No.32
CRR 272 of 2020
In the matter of : Smt. Namita Nayek @ Mallick
Ms. Madhurima Sarkar Ms. Ankita Dey …. For the Petitioner
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner files a written instruction given by the petitioner and submits that petitioner would not like to press this application.
The written instruction is taken on record.
On the prayer of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the revisional application is dismissed as not pressed.
Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, is
to be given to the parties upon usual undertakings.
(Jay Sengupta, J.)
Smt. Namita Nayek @ Mallick
none stated
Jay Sengupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
