The High Court dismissed a writ petition for default due to the petitioner's non-appearance across multiple hearings, vacated any interim orders, and directed the relevant department to communicate the order.
The matter was dismissed for default by the Court; any interim order stands vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
27.09.2021 80 suman (via Video Conference) CRR 2635 of 2010
Q5 In the matter of : Kakali Prasad
… Petitioner.
Ms. Anasuya Sinha
… for the State
This matter has been called on several days and none has appeared on behalf of the petitioner. No accommodation has been prayed for. When the matter was called on today, none has appeared on behalf of the petitioner.
Accordingly, this matter is dismissed for default and connected applications, if any, are also dismissed. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
The department concerned is directed to communicate the order passed in Court today to the Court below. The department shall ensure that acknowledgement of receipt of their communication is received. Report of compliance to be placed before this Court after three weeks.
The lower Court is directed to expeditiously act in accordance with law.
(Shekhar B. Saraf, J.)
Kakali Prasad
The State
Shekhar B. Saraf
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
