Application under Section 401 and 482 of CrPC 1973 dismissed for default as petitioner showed unwillingness to proceed due to lack of notice to opposite parties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
08.11.2021 Sl. No. 13 Srimanta Ct. No. – 25 D/L
CRR/4/2010 (Via Video Conference)
In Re : An application under Section 401 read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.
And
In the matter of : Mahadev Maity.
… petitioner.
None appears on behalf of the petitioner. It is also not clear as to whether the petitioner served notice of the instant criminal revision to the opposite parties in terms of the order dated 5th January, 2010.
In view of such circumstances, it appears to the Court that the petitioner is not willing to proceed with the case. Accordingly, the instant revision is dismissed for default.
(Bibek Chaudhuri, J.)
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Mahadev Maity
Bibek Chaudhuri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
