Safina Khatun v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
Revisional application dismissed by the court because the petitioner did not press the application through counsel.
What the court decided
04.03.2021 8 SB Ct. No.32
CRR 180 of 2007
In the matter of : Safina Khatun Mr. Pratip Kumar Chatterjee Ms. Priyanka Saha …. For the Petitioner
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner files a written instruction given by the petitioner and submits that petitioner would not like to press this application.
The written instruction is taken on record.
On the prayer of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the revisional application is dismissed as not pressed.
Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, is
to be given to the parties upon usual undertakings.
(Jay Sengupta, J.)
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Safina Khatun
Coram
Jay Sengupta
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Calcutta HC
- Decided on
- · March
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRR/180/2007
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court