The petitioner failed to appear on behalf of himself. The matter and connected applications were dismissed for default, and any interim order was vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
26.8.2021 401 Sc
(Via Video Conference)
CRR 1782 OF 2009
-------
In the matter of: Gopal @ Habu Banik
…. Petitioner
Mr. Avik Ghatak
…For the Opposite Party/State
This matter has been called on several days and none has appeared on behalf of the petitioner. No accommodation has been prayed for. When the matter was called on today, none has appeared on behalf of the petitioner.
Accordingly, this matter is dismissed for default and connected applications, if any, are also dismissed. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
The department concerned is directed to communicate this order, passed in Court today, to the Court below. The department shall ensure that acknowledgement of receipt of its communication is received. Report of compliance to be placed before this Court after three weeks.
The lower court is directed to expeditiously act in accordance with law.
(Shekhar B. Saraf, J.)
Gopal @ Habu Banik
Shekhar B. Saraf
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
