Arun Gorey v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner failed to appear via video conference. Court dismissed the continuing review of record along with connected applications and vacated the interim order for want of prosecution.
What the court decided
Sl. 77 23.9.2021 Court No.26 SD
CRR 156 of 2006 (Via Video Conference)
In the matter of: Arun Gorey
… Petitioner.
Sayed Shamsher Ali
… for the State.
This matter has been called on several days and none has appeared on behalf of the petitioner. No accommodation has been prayed for. When the matter was called on today, none has appeared on behalf of the petitioner.
Accordingly, this matter is dismissed for default and connected applications, if any, are also dismissed. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
The department concerned is directed to communicate the order passed in Court today to the Court below. The department shall ensure that acknowledgement of receipt of their communication is received. Report of compliance to be placed before this Court after three weeks.
The lower Court is directed to expeditiously act in accordance with law.
(Shekhar B. Saraf, J.)
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Arun Gorey
- respondent
Sayed Shamsher Ali
Coram
Shekhar B. Saraf
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Calcutta HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRR/156/2006
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court