Dismissed
Arpita Mandal v. State of West Bengal
Calcutta HCCRM/903/2021
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
for default) C.R.M. 903 of 2021 (Via Video…
What the court decided
AI extract
for default) C.R.M. 903 of 2021 (Via Video…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
93 23.12.2021 C.R.M. 903 of 2021 (AD) (Via Video Conference) Court No.29 (Dismissed In Re: - An application for cancellation of bail under Section 439(2) for default) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. And In the matter of: - Arpita Mandal ...petitioner. Mr. Iqbal Kabir … for the State. Mr. Kishore Mukherjee … for the opposite party no.2. None appears for the petitioner. There subsisting an order dated September 29, 2021 recording that the petitioner obtained change from the then advocate for the petitioner. State and the opposite party no.2 are represented. Accordingly C.R.M. 903 of 2021 is dismissed for default. (Debangsu Basak, J.)
(Bibhas Ranjan De, J.)
2
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Arpita Mandal
The State
Debangsu Basak
Bibhas Ranjan De
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court