Allowed

Amir Mia @ Amir Ali v. State of West Bengal

Calcutta HC23 Dec 2021CRM/8797/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a C.R.M. under Section 438 CrPC regarding multiple complaints filed for the same incident involving property disputes. The bail was subject to conditions including a bond, sureties, and regular appearance for trial.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted subject to a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties, compliance with Section 438(2) CrPC conditions, and appearance in Court for trial.

Amir Mia @ Amir Ali Vs State of West Bengal — Cheating and Forgery | Calcutta HC (2021)

¶1

C.R.M. 8797 of 2021 (Via Video Conference)

¶2

47 23.12.2021 (Via Video Conference) (AD) Court No.29 ( Allowed) In Re: - An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Chanchal P.S. Case No. 345 of 2021 dated 20/05/2021 under Sections 448/323/325/326/307/354/376/511/436/379/506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶3

And ….petitioner. …for the petitioner. …for the State.

¶4

In the matter of: Amir Mia @ Amir Ali ….petitioner. Mr. Kaustav Bagchi Mr. A. Sarkar Mr. Debayan Ghosh Mr. Narayan Prasad Agarwala Mr. Pratick Bose

¶5

Petitioner seeks anticipatory bail.

¶6

Learned Advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that three police complaints are out of a same incident. The first one was lodged by the petitioner. Thereafter, two other complaints were lodged against the petitioner in respect of the same incident. In one of the two latter complaints, the petitioner was granted anticipatory bail.

¶7

Learned Advocate appearing for the State draws the attention of the Court to the statement recorded under Section 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and the contents in the case diary.

¶8

Considering the nature of incident and the complicity of the petitioner therein and considering the fact that there are property disputes between the private parties and considering

¶9

¶10

the fact that three police complaints are proceeding in respect of the same incident and in one of them the petitioner is on anticipatory bail and considering the fact that the police submitted charge sheet, we grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

¶11

Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest, the petitioner shall be released on bail upon furnishing a Bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer and also subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the jurisdictional Court on the dates fixed for trial and pray for regular bail within four weeks from date.

¶12

The application for anticipatory bail being C.R.M. 8797 of 2021 is, thus, disposed of.

¶13

(Debangsu Basak, J.)

¶14

(Bibhas Ranjan De, J.)

Amir Mia @ Amir Ali v. State of West Bengal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Amir Mia @ Amir Ali v. State of West Bengal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bishu Biswas@Biswanath Biswas Vs State of West Bengal

Bapi Ghosh Vs State of West Bengal

Bablu Mandal and Another Vs State of West Bengal

Asman Sk. Vs the State of West Bengal

Sambuddha Majumdar Vs the State of West Bengal

Bina Devi and Anr. Vs State of West Bengal