Allowed

Netai Das v. State of West Bengal

Calcutta HC27 Sept 2021CRM/72/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Two concurrent applications for cancellation of bail were heard via video conference. Bail for Gopal Chandra Ghosh was cancelled for suppressing a High Court rejection order. Bishal Singha was restrained from entering the police station jurisdiction except for court/IO reporting.

What did the court decide?

Bail granted to Gopal Chandra Ghosh cancelled; instructions issued for his custody. Bishal Singha restrained from entering police station jurisdiction except for official court/IO purposes.

Netai Das Vs State of West Bengal — Quashing and FIR | Calcutta HC (2021)

¶1

27.09.2021 Serial no.46 & 47 Dd

¶2

(Through Video Conference)

¶3

CRM 72 of 2021 With

¶4

CRM 4800 of 2021

¶5

In re : An Applications for cancellation of bail under Section 439(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶6

-And-

¶7

In the matter of : Netai Das … …Petitioner

¶8

Mr. Shibaji Kumar Das,

¶9

Mr. Satyabrata Mondal,

¶10

Ms. Rupsa Sreemani, Advocates … … For the Petitioner in both applications

¶11

Mr. Narayan Prasad Agarwala Ms. Subhasree Patel, Advocates … …For the State in CRM 72 of 2021

¶12

Mr. Rana Mukherjee, ld. APP

¶13

Ms. Sujata Das,

¶14

… …For the State in CRM 4800 of 2021

¶15

Mr. Souvik Mitter

¶16

Mr. Sumanta Das, advocates

¶17

.. …For the OP no. 2 in CRM 72 of 2021

¶18

Mr. Debasis Kar Mr. Arindam Jana, Mr. Arif Mondal, advocates

¶19

.. …for the OP no. 2 in CRM 4800 of 2021

¶20

Affidavit on behalf of Gopal Chandra Ghosh filed in court be taken on record.

¶21

Learned advocate appearing for the Gopal Chandra Ghosh seeks mercy of this court for his client. He submits that his client tenders unqualified apology for suppressing the material fact of rejection of his application for bail by the High

¶22

¶23

Court before the jurisdictional court while obtaining bail from the jurisdictional Court.

¶24

Learned advocate appearing for Bishal Singha submits that his client will not repeat the alleged incident. He submits that the court may be pleased to direct his client not to enter into the jurisdiction of the police station where the complaint was lodged save and except for the purpose of attending Court.

¶25

State and the applicants are represented.

¶26

Considering the contents of the affidavit and considering the fact that Gopal Chandra Ghosh obtained an order granting him bail from the jurisdictional Court subsequent to the rejection of the application for bail by the High Court by suppressing such order of rejection from the jurisdictional Court, we cancel the bail granted in favour of Gopal Chandra Ghosh.

¶27

Learned advocate appearing for the State submits that Gopal Chandra Ghosh is present in court along with the Investigating Officer as per the earlier direction of this court.

¶28

In view of the cancellation of bail of Gopal Chandra Ghosh police will take necessary steps to take him into custody forthwith.

¶29

So far Bishal Singha is concerned, there is a report of the police to the effect that he abused the petitioner subsequent to the bail. It would be appropriate to restrain Bishal Singha from entering into the jurisdiction of the local police station where the complaint was lodged save and except for the purpose of reporting to the Investigating Officer of the case or attending the court on the dates of hearing.

¶30

Both the applications are disposed of.

¶31

(Debangsu Basak, J.)

¶32

(Ananda Kumar Mukherjee, J.)

Netai Das v. State of West Bengal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Netai Das v. State of West Bengal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jahangir Alam Vs State of West Bengal

Mustakein Sk @ Molla Vs State of West Bengal

Jagdeep Kumar @Bhurali and Ors. Vs State of West Bengal

Ali Hossain Mallick Vs State of West Bengal

Rakesh Biswas @ Chotka Vs State of West Bengal

Nilratan Adhikary and Anr. Vs State of West Bengal