Allowed

Batish Roy v. the State of West Bengal

Calcutta HC23 Nov 2021CRM/56/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court at Calcutta allowed an application for anticipatory bail. The court held that custodial detention was not warranted, granting bail with bond conditions and a requirement to meet the investigating officer weekly, valid for eight weeks.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail allowed with bond of Rs. 10,000, two sureties, weekly meetings with IO, valid for eight weeks.

Batish Roy Vs the State of West Bengal — Anticipatory Bail | Calcutta HC (2021)

¶1

23.11.2021

¶2

Item No.33 Ct.No.1 dc./gsd

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CIRCUIT BENCH AT JALPAIGURI

¶4

C.R.M. 56 of 2021

¶5

CRAN 1 of 2021

¶6

(Via Video Conference)

¶7

In Re : An Application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure filed in connection with Rajganj PS Case No. 137 of 2020 dated 5.9.2020 (GR Case No. 3877 of 2020) under Sections 323/324/376/506 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶8

And In the matter of : Batish Roy ... Petitioner.

¶9

Mr. Jaydeep Kanta Bhomik … for the petitioner Mr. Arun Kumar Sarkar Mr. Sagnik Sankar Sikdar ... For the State.

¶10

Records of the application reflect that by an order dated 16.12.2020, a Coordinate Bench of this Court was pleased to grant interim order to the present petitioner. Status Report so called for from the State has not been produced. However, the Case Diary has been produced.

¶11

The Learned Advocate for the State submits that there is no complaint regarding misuse of liberty during the period when the petitioner was on interim bail.

¶12

¶13

Having regard to the circumstances of the case, we are of the opinion that custodial detention of the petitioner may not be warranted in the facts and circumstances of the case.

¶14

Accordingly, we allow the application for anticipatory bail and direct that in the event of arrest, the petitioner, namely Batish Roy shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only), with two sureties of like amount each, one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer/Investigating Officer and subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and on further condition that the petitioner shall meet with the Investigating Officer of the case once a week until further orders or, as modified by the jurisdictional Court.

¶15

This order of anticipatory bail will remain in force for a period of eight weeks from date.

¶16

The application for anticipatory bail, being CRM 56 of 2021 along with CRAN 1 of 2021 stands disposed of.

¶17

All parties shall act on the server copy of this order, duly obtained from the official website of the Hon’ble High Court Calcutta.

¶18

Urgent Xerox certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties, subject to compliance with all requisite formalities.

¶19

(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)

¶20

(Subrata Talukdar, J.)

Batish Roy v. the State of West Bengal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Batish Roy v. the State of West Bengal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Manik Barman and Ors. Vs the State of West Bengal

Chittaranjan Das@Kedo Vs State of West Bengal

Nasruma Anam Bibi Vs State of West Bengal

Ajahar Ali@ Raja MD and Ors. Vs the State of West Bengal

Julfikar Ali @ Julfigar @ Julficar Vs the State of West Bengal

Shyamal Saha@Shama Saha Vs State of West Bengal