Sabita Mistry v. State of West Bengal
Case brief
What is this about?
An application for bail under Section 439 CrPC was dismissed because the petitioner's counsel instructed that the application should not be pressed.
An application for bail under Section 439 CrPC was dismissed because the petitioner's counsel instructed that the application should not be pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
12 28-09-2021 (ct. no.32) KOLE
CRM 5500 of 2021
In re: An application for bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Murutia Police Station Case No. 156 of 2021 dated 03.08.2021 under Sections 498A/304B/302/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
In the matter of : Sabita Mistry
Mr. A. Mondal,
Mr. F. Hossain, Mr. A. Mitra,
… For the State.
Learned Advocate for the petitioner submits that he has instructions not to press this application for bail.
CRM 5500 of 2021 is, accordingly, dismissed as not pressed.
( Bivas Pattanayak, J. ) ( Arijit Banerjee, J. )
Sabita Mistry
The State
Bivas Pattanayak
Arijit Banerjee
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court