Sikha Mistry v. State of West Bengal
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner voluntarily withdrew the bail application under Section 439 CrPC; the application was dismissed as not pressed by the learned advocate.
Petitioner voluntarily withdrew the bail application under Section 439 CrPC; the application was dismissed as not pressed by the learned advocate.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
5 01-10-2021 (ct. no.32) KOLE
CRM 5180 of 2021
In re: An application for bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Habra Police Station Case No. 208 of 2021 dated 10.04.2021 under Sections 498A/302/304B/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.
In the matter of : Sikha Mistry
Mr. M. Islam Kayal,
Mr. P. P. Das, Mr. M. Roy,
… For the State.
Learned Advocate for the petitioner submits that he has instructions not to press this application for bail.
CRM 5180 of 2021 is, accordingly, dismissed as not pressed.
( Bivas Pattanayak, J. ) ( Arijit Banerjee, J. )
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Sikha Mistry
State
Bivas Pattanayak
Arijit Banerjee
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court