An application under Section 438 CrPC for anticipatory bail was dismissed because the petitioner filed a written instruction not to press the application before this court.
Application dismissed as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
04.10.2021 Item no.4. Court No.32. AB
(Via Video Conference)
CRM No.4798 of 2021
In Re: An Application for Anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Khardah Police Station Case No.467 of 2018 Dated 27.06.2018 under Sections 306/34 of the Indian Penal Code corresponding to Rahara P. S. Case No. 109 of 2020.
And
In the matter of : Chayan Biswas @ Nakul Biswas
……Petitioner.
Mr. M. Goswami, Mr. P. Goswami …for the Petitioner. Mr. Bidyut Kr. Ray, Ms. Rita Dutta …for the State.
Learned Advocate for the petitioner submits that he has instructions not to press this application.
Written instruction filed on behalf of the petitioner be kept on record.
Accordingly, C.R.M. No.4798 of 2021 is dismissed as not pressed.
All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court.
(Bivas Pattanayak, J.)
(Arijit Banerjee, J.)
2
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Chayan Biswas @ Nakul Biswas
The State
Bivas Pattanayak
Arijit Banerjee
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
