Allowed

Pintu Sharma @ Pintu Kumar @ Amit Ranjan v. State of West Bengal

Calcutta HC24 Aug 2021CRM/4614/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Special Judge allowed bail to the prime accused's co-accused, Pintu Sharma, noting he had spent 167 days in custody. The court granted bail subject to a bond, sureties, periodic reporting, and restrictions on leaving West Bengal.

What did the court decide?

Release on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of like amount, one local, subject to conditions of not leaving West Bengal, reporting fortnightly, and appearing in court.

Pintu Sharma @ Pintu Kumar @ Amit Ranjan Vs State of West… — Narcotics (NDPS) | Calcutta HC (2021)

¶1

12 24-08-2021 (ct. no.32) KOLE Allowed

¶2

(Via Video Conference)

¶3

CRM 4614 of 2021

¶4

In re: An application for bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Howrah GRPS Case No. 11 of 2021 dated 06.03.2021 under Sections 468/471/120B of the Indian Penal Code read with Sections 25(1B)/25(8)/26/30 of the Arms Act.

¶5

A n d -

¶6

In the matter of : Sri Pintu Sharma @ Pintu Kumar @ Amit Ranjan

¶7

Mr. Sandipan Ganguly, Sr. Adv. Mr. S. Dere,

¶8

… For the Petitioner.

¶9

Mr. S. Ghosh,

¶10

Mr. A. K. Datta,

¶11

The allegation against the petitioner is under various sections of the Indian Penal Code and the Arms Act.

¶12

Today, we have granted bail to the prime accused in the case in CRM 4082 of 2021. The petitioner is a coaccused.

¶13

Having considered the material in the case diary, we are of the view that the petitioner’s prayer for bail may be allowed as he has already spent 167 days in custody. Charge-sheet has been filed.

¶14

Accordingly, we direct that the petitioner shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000/-, with two sureties of like amount each, one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction of the Learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Howrah.

¶15

¶16

And on further conditions that he shall not leave the State of West Bengal without the prior permission of the learned Trial Court. He shall also intimate to the learned Trial Court the address where he will be residing in West Bengal. He will report to the Officer-in-Charge of the concerned police station within the jurisdiction of which he will reside now, once in a fortnight until further orders. The petitioner shall appear before the trial Court on every date of hearing until further orders and shall not intimidate the witnesses and/or tamper with evidence in any manner whatsoever.

¶17

In the event the petitioner fails to adhere to any of the conditions stipulated above without justifiable cause, the trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the petitioner’s bail in accordance with law without further reference to this court.

¶18

The application for bail is, accordingly, allowed.

¶19

All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the

¶20

order downloaded from the official website of this Court.

¶21

( Suvra Ghosh, J. ) ( Arijit Banerjee, J. )

Pintu Sharma @ Pintu Kumar @ Amit Ranjan v. State of West Bengal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pintu Sharma @ Pintu Kumar @ Amit Ranjan v. State of West Bengal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Anchhar Ali Vs the State of West Bengal

Dipak Roy Vs the State of West Bengal

Sunny @Sonu Das Vs State of West Bengal

Nirmal Bag Vs State of West Bengal

Kalam Sk Vs State of West Bengal

Aata Khotey @ Sailen Khotey Vs State of West Bengal