Allowed

Nandalal Sarkar v. the State of West Bengal

Calcutta HC19 Aug 2021CRM/429/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bench of Suvra Ghosh and Arijit Banerjee granted bail to Nandalal Sarkar under Section 439 CrPC regarding charges under IPC 302 and related sections. Court observed no danger to investigation as charge sheet was filed and witness was not named against petitioner.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000/ with two sureties of like amount each. Standard conditions of reporting and appearing in court granted.

Nandalal Sarkar Vs the State of West Bengal — Bail and Remand | Calcutta HC (2021)

¶1

19.08.2021 Item no. 06 (J.C.) Court No.32. S.De. (Allowed)

¶2

In the High Court at Calcutta

¶3

Circuit Bench at Jalpaiguri

¶4

(Via Video Conference)

¶5

CRM 429 of 2021 with

¶6

I.A. No.CRAN 1 of 2021

¶7

In Re: An application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure filed on 22.03.2021 in connection with Mathabhanga Police Station Case No. 380 of 2020 dated 17.09.2020 under Sections 147/148/149/324/326/302 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶8

And

¶9

In the matter of : Nandalal Sarkar.

¶10

……Petitioner.

¶11

Mr. Sabyasachi Banerjee, Advocate, Mr. Arnab Saha, Advocate, Mr.Abhimanyu Banerjee, Advocate,

¶12

……for the Petitioner.

¶13

Mr. Ujjwal Luksom, Advocate, Mr. Aniruddha Biswas, Advocate,

¶14

……for the State.

¶15

Supplementary affidavit filed in Court on behalf of the petitioner be taken on record.

¶16

The petitioner says that he has been languishing in jail for about 335 days. Charge sheet has been submitted. There is no reason to further detain the petitioner.

¶17

¶18

We have seen the material in the case diary. The petitioner was not named by the injured eyewitness. A co-accused who was named by the injured eyewitness has been granted bail by this Court by an order dated March 17, 2021 passed in CRM 298 of 2021.

¶19

The State strongly opposes the prayer for bail.

¶20

Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and the nature of allegation made against this petitioner and having regard to the fact that charge sheet has been submitted upon completion of investigation, we are of the view that further detention of the petitioner is not necessary.

¶21

Accordingly, we direct that the petitioner shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of like amount each, one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Mathabhanga, Cooch Behar and on further conditions that he shall remain within the jurisdiction of the concerned police station and he shall report to the Officer-inCharge of the concerned police station once in a fortnight until further orders. The petitioner shall appear before the trial court on every date of hearing until further orders and shall not intimidate the witnesses and/or tamper with evidence in any manner whatsoever.

¶22

In the event the petitioner fails to adhere to any of the conditions stipulated above without justifiable cause, the

¶23

¶24

trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the petitioner’s bail in accordance with law without further reference to this Court.

¶25

The application for bail is, accordingly, allowed.

¶26

I.A. CRAN 1 of 2021 is disposed of.

¶27

All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court.

¶28

(Suvra Ghosh, J.)

¶29

(Arijit Banerjee, J.)

Nandalal Sarkar v. the State of West Bengal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nandalal Sarkar v. the State of West Bengal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ajal Ali @ Ajad Ali @ Azad Ali Vs the State of West Bengal

Alamin Haque @ Alammin Vs State of West Bengal

Anan Toppo @ Aman Toppo Vs the State of West Bengal

Jyotish Barman and Anr. Vs the State of West Bengal

Hari Roy Chowdhury Vs the Union of India

Arif Ali Molla Vs State of West Bengal and Ors.