Allowed

Hazi Ketab Ali Sardar v. State of West Bengal

Calcutta HC8 Feb 2021CRM/278/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court granted bail to Hazi Ketab Ali Sardar, charged under sections 302/120B/34 IPC in a murder-cum-conspiracy case, directing his release upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties and imposing specific conditions regarding jurisdiction and appearance.

What did the court decide?

Release on bail requiring a bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties (one local), non-entry into Malda district except for hearings, weekly reporting to the police station, and prohibition on intimidati

Hazi Ketab Ali Sardar Vs State of West Bengal — Bail and Remand | Calcutta HC (2021)

¶1

08.02.2021 Court No.28 Item No. 16 Krishnendu Bail Granted

¶2

CRM 278 of 2021 (Via video Conference)

¶3

In Re:- An application for bail under section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure ;

¶4

And In Re: Hazi Ketab Ali Sardar

¶5

Petitioner

¶6

Mr. Milon Mukherjee Mrs. Soma Chowdhury (Bandhu)

¶7

For the Petitioner Mr. Madhusudan Sur, ld. A.P.P. Mr. Dipankar Paramanick For the State

¶8

The present application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure has been preferred by the petitioner in connection with Kaliachak Police Station Case No. 444 of 2013 dated 30.07.2013 under sections 302/120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶9

Mr. Mukherjee, learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. His name does not feature in the First Information Report. The principal accused, namely, Abdul Salam, has already been granted statutory bail. Upon completion of investigation, charge-sheet has also been filed and as such further detention of the petitioner, who is in custody for 435 days, is not necessary.

¶10

Mr. Sur, learned advocate appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail and draws our attention to the statements of the wife of the deceased and a neighbour, namely, Abul Kalam,

¶11

¶12

recorded under section 161 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and also the statements of one Setaur Rahaman and Md. Motiur Rahaman recorded under section 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶13

Having heard the learned advocates appearing for the respective parties and considering the materials in the case diary, the nature of allegations, the period of detention and the extent of complicity of the petitioner in the alleged offence, we are of the opinion that further detention of the petitioner is not warranted.

¶14

Accordingly, we direct that the petitioner, Hazi Ketab Ali Sardar, shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of like amount each, one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Malda and subject to a condition that the petitioner shall be present before the trial court on the dates fixed for hearing.

¶15

The petitioner shall not enter the jurisdiction of the district of Malda, save and except on the dates fixed for hearing before the learned trial court.

¶16

The petitioner shall meet the Officer-in-Charge of the concerned Police Station, where he would be residing, once in a week on and from 15^th February, 2021 until further orders and shall intimate the address where he would be residing to the said Officer-in-Charge of the concerned Police Station.

¶17

¶18

It is also made clear that the petitioner shall not intimidate witnesses and/or tamper with evidence in any manner whatsoever.

¶19

In the event the petitioner fails to appear before the trial court without justifiable cause, the trial court shall be at liberty to cancel his bail automatically without reference to this court.

¶20

With the aforesaid observations, the application for bail, being CRM No. 278 of 2021, is disposed of.

¶21

All parties shall act on the server copies of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.

¶22

(Tirthankar Ghosh, J) (Tapabrata Chakraborty, J)

Hazi Ketab Ali Sardar v. State of West Bengal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Hazi Ketab Ali Sardar v. State of West Bengal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Faruk Sk and Ors. Vs State of West Bengal

Sanjoy Chatterjee @ Picklu Vs State of West Bengal

Parvin Begam@Pammi Vs State of West Bengal