Single-judge court dismissed an application for anticipatory bail for default as no advocate appeared on behalf of the petitioner
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
14.06.2021 Court No.28 Item No.26 Krishnendu Dismissed
CRM 2322 of 2021 (Via video Conference)
In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure filed in connection with Nazat Police Station Case No. 113 of 2020 dated 03.07.2020 under sections 498A/302/304B/34 of the Indian Penal Code and section 4 of the D.P. Act.
And
In Re: Ramani Kayal
Petitioner
Mr. Saswata Gopal Mukherjee Mrs. Faria Hossain Mrs. Sonali Das
For the State
Records reveal that no one appeared on behalf of the petitioner
when the matter was last heard on 28.05.2021.
Today also no one appears on behalf of the petitioner and no accommodation has been sought for though Mrs. Hossain, learned advocate appearing for the State, is present.
In view thereof, the application for anticipatory bail, being CRM 2322 of 2021, is dismissed for default.
All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.
(Kausik Chanda, J.) (Tapabrata Chakraborty, J.)
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ramani Kayal
State
Kausik Chanda
Tapabrata Chakraborty
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
