The court dismissed an application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC as 'not pressed' before it, noting that the written instruction was produced on record. The primary charge involved Sections 417/418/406/34 IPC.
Application for anticipatory bail dismissed as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
24.11.2021 Court No.32 Item No.01 Krishnendu Not Pressed
CRM No. 1653 of 2021 (Via video Conference)
In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure filed in connection with Bagnan Police Station Case No. 157 of 2013 dated 02.05.2013 under sections 417/418/406/34 of the Indian Penal Code (charge sheet submitted under sections 420/34 of the Indian Penal Code). And
In Re: Hema Das (Saha) Mr. Amarendra Chakraborty Mr. S.G. Mukherjee, ld. P.P.
...For the Petitioner
On the prayer of the learned advocate appearing for the petitioner, the application for anticipatory bail, being CRM 1653 of 2021, is dismissed as ‘ not pressed’ .
Let the written instruction, as produced, be kept on record. All parties shall act on the server copies of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.
(Sugato Majumdar, J.) (Tapabrata Chakraborty, J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the application for anticipatory bail, not pressed before the court, should be dismissed.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
An application for anticipatory bail
Hema Das (Saha)
Sugato Majumdar
Tapabrata Chakraborty
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
