Dismissed
Mita Pal@Mita Biswas v. the State
Calcutta HCCRM/13/2021
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CRIMINAL APPELLATE…
What the court decided
AI extract
HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CRIMINAL APPELLATE…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION [ CIRCUIT BENCH AT PORT BLAIR ]
…
CRM/13/2021
Mita Pal @ Mita Biswas … petitioner Vs. The State … Respondent Mr. Parvej Anam, Advocate … for the petitioner (through virtual mode) Mr.Sumit Karmakar, Advocate … for the respondent
December 6, 2021 [GNC] Item No.1
The petitioner seeks anticipatory bail.
Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was falsely implicated. The police filed chargesheet and therefore custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not required. Learned advocate appearing for the respondent submits that the petitioner was involved in a chit fund business.
Considering the gravity of the offences and the involvement of the petitioner therein and the fact that the public are involved, we are unable to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
CRM/13/2021 stands rejected.
(Debangsu Basak, J. )
(Jay Sengupta, J. )
Mita Pal @ Mita Biswas
The State
Debangsu Basak
Jay Sengupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court