Allowed

Pradip Kumar Sah @ Sha @ Dipak Kumar Sah v. the State of West Bengal

Calcutta HC21 Dec 2021CRM/1232/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Circuit Bench of Calcutta High Court at Jalpaiguri granted anticipatory bail to Pradip Kumar Sah in a POSCO Act case, directing release on a personal and local surety upon arrest, with conditions to appear in court and not enter the police station jurisdiction.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner's prayer for anticipatory bail allowed; directed to be released on bail of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties upon arrest.

Pradip Kumar Sah @ Sha @ Dipak Kumar Sah Vs… — Child Sexual Offences (POCSO) | Calcutta HC (2021)

¶1

21.12.2021 SL No.25 Court No.1 (gc)

¶2

Circuit Bench of Calcutta High Court At Jalpaiguri

¶3

CRM 1232 of 2021 (Via video Conference)

¶4

In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure filed in connection with Falakata Police Station Case No.103 of 2020 dated 11.03.2020 under Sections 363/365/376(3)/109 of the Indian Penal Code read with Section 4 of the POCSO Act.

¶5

And

¶6

In the matter of : Pradip Kumar Sah @ Sha @ Dipak Kumar Sah

¶7

Petitioner.

¶8

Mr. Arnab Saha

¶9

… For the Petitioner. Mr. Abhijit Sarkar, Mr. Aniruddha Biswas, … For the State.

¶10

The learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the instant case. It is submitted that the principal accused, namely, Rakesh and another person, namely, Rabindra Nath Sarkar have been granted bail by the Special Judge, Alipurduar. It is further submitted that no overtact has been attributed to the petitioner.

¶11

The learned Counsel for the State, however, opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail.

¶12

Having considered the materials available in the case diary and the nature and extent of involvement of the petitioner in the commission of alleged offence and also having regard to the fact that two accused persons are already on bail and the charge-sheet

¶13

¶14

has already been filed, we are of the opinion that custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not required. Hence, we are inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is allowed.

¶15

Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest the

¶16

petitioner, namely, Pradip Kumar Sah @ Sha @ Dipak Kumar Sah , shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/-, with two sureties of like amount each, one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer and subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

¶17

And on a further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the trial court on every date of hearing until further orders and on further condition that the petitioner shall not enter the jurisdiction of Falakata Police Station except for meeting the Investigating Officer and/or attending the Court proceedings and shall disclose his present address to the Investigating Officer.

¶18

The application for anticipatory bail, being CRM No.1232 of 2021 is, thus, disposed of.

¶19

All parties shall act on the server copies of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.

¶20

(Biswajit Basu, J.) (Soumen Sen, J.)

Pradip Kumar Sah @ Sha @ Dipak Kumar Sah v. the State of West Bengal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pradip Kumar Sah @ Sha @ Dipak Kumar Sah v. the State of West Bengal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Anand Singh @ Anand Kumar Singh Vs Smt Gomti Devi Poddar and Ors.

Rathin Majumder Vs Narayan Chandra Kundu

Rajesh Rai and Ors. Vs the State of West Bengal and Ors.

Pradip Barman Vs the State of West Bengal

Rahul Modak Vs the State of West Bengal

Jafurul Hoque@ Hussain Vs the State of West Bengal