Allowed

Sankar Saha v. State of West Bengal

Calcutta HC9 Mar 2021CRM/10714/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner under Section 438 CrPC apprehending arrest in a Section 365 IPC case. Considering the lack of overt acts and potential victimization, the court held custodial interrogation unwarranted.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail allowed; direction to release petitioner on bail upon arrest upon furnishing bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of like amount.

Sankar Saha Vs State of West Bengal — Anticipatory Bail | Calcutta HC (2021)

¶1

09.03.2021 Court No.28 Item No. 128 Krishnendu Allowed

¶2

CRM 10714 of 2020 (Via video Conference)

¶3

In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure;

And

In Re : Sankar Saha

Petitioner

Mr. Dhiraj Trivedi Mr. Ajit Kumar Mishra Mr. Abhra Mukherjee Mr. Dipankar Mahata

¶8

Apprehending arrest in connection with Ghola P.S. Case No. 530 of 2020 dated 01.11.2020 under section 365 of the Indian Penal Code, the petitioner has filed the present application.

¶9

Mr. Trivedi, learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been victimized due to a political vendetta. No overt act has been attributed to the petitioner and the allegations levelled against him are absolutely unfounded. In the said conspectus, custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not warranted.

¶10

Mr. Mukherjee, learned advocate appearing for the State opposes the petitioner’s prayer for anticipatory bail and draws our attention to the statement of the victim lady, as recorded under section 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶11

Having heard the learned advocates appearing for the respective parties and considering the nature of allegations, the statement of the victim lady recorded under 164 of the Code of

¶12

¶13

Criminal Procedure and the extent of complicity of the petitioner in the alleged offence, we are of the opinion that the custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not warranted in the facts and circumstances of the case. As such, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is allowed.

¶14

Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest the petitioner, namely , Sankar Saha, shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of like amount each, one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer and subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

¶15

The application for anticipatory bail, being CRM No. 10714 of 2020 is, thus, disposed of.

¶16

All parties shall act on the server copies of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.

¶17

(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.) (Tapabrata Chakraborty, J.)

Sankar Saha v. State of West Bengal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sankar Saha v. State of West Bengal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sudip Samanta Vs State of West Bengal

Bidhan Nath and Anr. Vs State of West Bengal

Pranab Ghosh @Babu Ghosh Vs State of West Bengal

Manoyara Bibi Vs State of West Bengal

Mangal Das Vs State of West Bengal

MD Ibrahim and Ors. Vs State of West Bengal