The Court dismissed an application for anticipatory bail as infructuous, noting that the application had already become inoperative.
C.R.M. 1004 of 2021 dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
13.12.2021 SL No.34 Court No.1 AJ
Circuit Bench of Calcutta High Court At Jalpaiguri
CRM 1004 of 2021 (Via video Conference)
In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure filed in connection with Kurseong Police Station Case No.159 of 2021 dated 13.09.2021 under Sections 468/471/420/406/354B/506 of the the Indian Penal Code.
And
….petitioner.
Mr. Anand Bhandari, Mr. Urgen Lama. … For the Petitioner.
Ms. Namrata Das. … For the State.
The learned Counsel for the petitioner on instruction submits that the application has become infructuous.
Accordingly, C.R.M. 1004 of 2021 stands dismissed as infructuous.
All parties shall act on the server copies of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.
(Biswajit Basu, J.) (Soumen Sen, J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an application for anticipatory bail has become infructuous and ought to be dismissed.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
the petitioner
the State
Biswajit Basu
Soumen Sen
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
