Dismissed
Ananda Kumar Pal v. State
Calcutta HCCRA/66/1991
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The appeal in C.R.A. No. 66 of 1991 was disposed of as abated since the appellant expired during the pendency of the appeal.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
AD. 12. September 1, 2021. MNS.
¶2
C.R.A. No. 66 of 1991
¶3
(Via Video Conference)
¶4
In the matter of: Ananda Kumar Pal
¶5
…appellant.
¶6
Mr. Ranabir Roychowdhury, Mr. N. P. Agarwal
¶7
…for the State.
¶8
In view of the office report dated August 31, 2021, it appears
¶9
that the appellant has expired during pendency of the appeal.
¶10
Accordingly, C.R.A. No. 66 of 1991 is disposed of as abated.
¶11
(Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya, J.)
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
Ananda Kumar Pal
- respondent
State
Coram
AI extract
Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Calcutta HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRA/66/1991
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court