This Court disposed of a contempt application as the impugned order was found to have been complied with by the authorities. No order as to costs was made.
No order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Ct. 19.8 No.
26 2021 1 akb
C.P.A.N. 349 of 2019 In
W.P.A. 4398 of 2018
Chanchal Kumar Chatterjee -Versus-
Mr. Parwez Ahmed Siddique & Ors. ( Via Video Conference )
Mr. Sakti Pada Jana Ms. Ujani Pal (Samanta) …For the Petitioner Mr. Bhaskar Prasad Vaisya Mr. Nilay Baran Mandal …For the respondent DPPG
Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the writ petitioner submits that the order against which the contempt application has been filed, has been complied with by the Authorities concerned. Accordingly, the contempt application is now infructuous.
In the light of the submissions made on behalf of the petitioner, the contempt application is disposed of.
There will be no order as to costs.
Urgent photostat copy of the order, if applied for, be supplied to the petitioner on priority basis on compliance of necessary formalities.
( Shekhar B. Saraf, J.)
Chanchal Kumar Chatterjee
Mr. Parwez Ahmed Siddique & Ors.
Shekhar B. Saraf
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
