Petitioner contended that a prior Court order was complied with. The Administration provided proof of compliance. No further order was necessary.
Application disposed; no further order passed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA SPECIAL JURISIDCTION [ CIRCUIT BENCH AT PORT BLAIR ]
**
CPAN/2/2020 IA NO.CAN/1/2021
R. Raghu @ R. Ragu … Petitioner
Vs.
Mr. Prem Singh Meena and another … Respondents Mrs. Anjili Nag, Advocate … for the petitioner
Mr. S.Chakraborty, Advocate Mr. R. Agarwal, Advocate …for the respondents
December 15, 2021 [SR]
Sl.No.9
Mrs. Nag, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the order passed by this Court, which is the subject matter of the present contempt application, was complied with by the respondent authorities.
Mr. Chakraborty, learned counsel for the Administration, hands over a copy of the order passed in this regard by the concerned respondent. The same is taken on record.
In view of the submissions made on behalf of the parties, there is no need to pass any further order on this application.
Accordingly, CPAN/2/2020 and the connected application being CAN/1/2021 are disposed of. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance of usual necessary formalities.
(Jay Sengupta, J.)
R. Raghu @ R. Ragu
Mr. Prem Singh Meena
Jay Sengupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
