Dismissed
Santu Pal v. Santana Mukherjee & Ors.
Calcutta HCCO/709/2020
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
24, 2021. MNS. C. O. No. 709 of 2020 (Via…
What the court decided
AI extract
24, 2021. MNS. C. O. No. 709 of 2020 (Via…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
AD. 5. August 24, 2021. MNS.
C. O. No. 709 of 2020 ( Via video conference )
Sri Santu Pal
Vs.
Smt. Santana Mukherjee and others
Mr. Dilip Kumar Chatterjee, Mr. Sagnik Chatterjee
…for the opposite parties.
When the matter is called on for hearing, none appears for the petitioner. This is the successive occasion when the matter was called on for hearing as the ‘motion’, but the petitioner went unrepresented, although learned counsel for the opposite parties have been present on both occasions.
As such, it appears that the petitioner is not interest to proceed with the matter.
Accordingly, C. O. No. 709 of 2020 is
dismissed for default.
There will be no order as to costs.
Urgent photostat certified copies of this order, if applied for, be made available to the parties upon compliance with the requisite formalities.
(Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya, J.)
Sri Santu Pal
Smt. Santana Mukherjee and others
Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court