Allowed

The Board of Trustees for the Port of Kolkata v. M/S Build India Construction & Anr.

Calcutta HC12 Aug 2021CO/2566/2008

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petition allowed ex parte setting aside an appellate order referring matter to arbitration due to lack of jurisdiction as no objection was raised before the first forum under Section 8.

What did the court decide?

CO No. 2566 of 2008 allowed ex parte; Appeal No.1 of 2008 set aside and remanded to appellate court for disposal on merits within one year.

The Board of Trustees for the Port of Kolkata Vs M/S Build… — Arbitration | Calcutta HC (2021)

¶1

110 12.08.2021 TN

¶2

CO No.2566 of 2008

¶3

The Board of Trustees for the Port of Kolkata Vs.

¶4

M/s Build India Construction Company and another

¶5

(Via video conference)

¶6

Mr. Probal Mukherjee, Mr. Ashok Kumar Jena

¶7

…. for the petitioner

¶8

Affidavit-of-service filed in court today be

¶9

kept on record.

¶10

It appears that despite repeated efforts, the opposite parties could not be served. It is evident that the opposite parties are apparently not residing at the premises-in-question any more, although the address to which the copies were sent pertains to the propertyin-dispute.

¶11

As such, there is no other option but to take up the matter for hearing ex parte.

¶12

Learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner argues that the appellate court acted palpably without jurisdiction in referring the matter to arbitration under Section 8 of the Arbitration and

¶13

¶14

Conciliation Act, 1996 (for brevity “the 1996 Act”) since no such application was presented before the Estate Officer, which was the first forum, as per the requirement of Section 8.

¶15

There is substance in such contention, since Section 8 of the 1996 Act contemplates the filing of an objection under Section 8 at the first occasion when the defendants or opposite parties, as the case may be, present their defence.

¶16

In the present case, since no such question was raised at all before the first forum, the appellate court did not have jurisdiction to entertain such an application and acted erroneously in allowing the same, thereby referring the matter to Arbitrator.

¶17

That apart, the scope of hearing by the appellate court under Section 9 of the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971 being limited to the legality and propriety of the order of the Estate Officer challenged before the said appellate court, it was beyond the jurisdiction of the appellate forum to exercise the powers vested solely with the first forum, in view of the specific language of Section 8 of the 1996 Act.

¶18

In such view of the matter, CO No.2566 of 2008 is allowed ex parte , thereby setting aside the Order No.23 dated May 17, 2008 passed by the Additional

¶19

¶20

District Judge, Fast Track Fourth Court at Tamluk, District: Purba Medinipur in Miscellaneous Appeal No.1 of 2008. The said appellate court shall now take up the appeal itself for hearing on merits and make endeavour to dispose of the same as expeditiously as possible, preferably within one year from the date of communication of this order to the appellate court.

¶21

There will be no order as to costs.

¶22

Urgent photostat certified copies of this order, if applied for, be made available to the parties upon compliance with the requisite formalities.

¶23

(Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya, J.)

The Board of Trustees for the Port of Kolkata v. M/S Build India Construction & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The Board of Trustees for the Port of Kolkata v. M/S Build India Construction & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Amit Guha Roy Vs Amlan Chowdhury and Anr.

Babul @ Bablu Kanti Nandy and Anr. Vs Chittaranjan Bhunia and Anr.

Barid Baran Roy Vs Gopal Banerjee & Ors.

Atanu Ghosh Vs Prabhash Chandra Dey & Ors.

K.M.C. Vs Kamalesh Chowdhury

K.M.C Vs Kamalesh Chowdhury