Tahmina Khatun & Ors. v. Sk. Md. Yusuf
Case brief
What is this about?
mb C.O. No. 1176 of 2009 with IA No. C.A.N.…
mb C.O. No. 1176 of 2009 with IA No. C.A.N.…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
90 05.08.2021 mb
C.O. No. 1176 of 2009 with IA No. C.A.N. 5 of 2019 (Old No. 11409 of 2019) with C.A.N. 6 of 2019 (Old No. C.A.N. 11853 of 2019)
(Via video conference)
Tahmina Khatun & Ors. -Vs.Sk Md. Yusuf
This is the second successive occasion,
when none appears for the parties at the time of hearing.
Accordingly, C.O. No. 1176 of 2009 along with C.A.N. 5 of 2019(Old No. C.A.N. 11409 of 2019) and C.A.N. 6 of 2019 (old No. C.A.N. 11853 of 2019) are dismissed for default.
There shall be no order as to costs.
Interim order, if any passed in this matter,
shall stand automatically vacated.
(Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya, J.)
Tahmina Khatun & Ors.
Sk Md. Yusuf
Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court