Petitioner submitted that payments were made as per the order, rendering the contempt application infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
OD-3
CC/7/2021 WITH CP/985/2014 CA/12/2020 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Special Jurisdiction (Contempt) ORIGINAL SIDE
SHIVA SHAKTI SECURITY SERVICES VS
RAKESH SHARMA AND 2 ORS
BEFORE:
The Hon'ble JUSTICE SHEKHAR B. SARAF Date : 9th April, 2021.
Appearance: Mr. Soumya Roy, Adv. Mr. Farim Rahman Molla, Adv. …for petitioner. Mr. Sukanta Ghosh, Adv. …for ASREC Mr. Paritosh Sinha, Adv. Mr. Joydeep Roy, Adv. …for IDBI Bank Ltd.
The Court : Counsel on behalf of the petitioner submits that payment
have been made as per the order passed, and, accordingly, this contempt application has become infructuous.
The contempt application is, accordingly, disposed of without passing any further order.
(SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J.)
SK.
SHIVA SHAKTI SECURITY SERVICES
RAKESH SHARMA
SHEKHAR B. SARAF
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
