Contempt application arising from a 2000 order in a writ petition. No party appeared on the second call, rendering the matter unadjudicated as the court noted apparent lack of interest by parties.
Rule, if any, stands discharged. Contempt application disposed of without any further order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
OD-2
CC 8 of 2001 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Special Jurisdiction (Contempt) ORIGINAL SIDE
MD. ANWAR HOSSAIN VS.
SRI ALOKE KUMAR SARKAR AND ANR.
BEFORE:
The Hon’ble JUSTICE ARINDAM MUKHERJEE Date: 29th June , 2021
The Court : This contempt application arises out of alleged violation of an order dated 31st January, 2000 passed in W. P. 269 of 2000. The matter appeared in the list on 28th June, 2021, when no one appeared on behalf of any of the parties even at the second call. The matter is appearing in the day’s list marked as ‘Last Chance’ with a note that appropriate orders will be passed if no one appears when the matter is taken up.
No one has applied for joining in the virtual mode. None of the parties are represented when the matter is called on. It appears that the parties are not interested in proceeding with the matter.
The contempt petition is disposed of without any further order.
Rule, if any, stands discharged.
( ARINDAM MUKHERJEE, J.)
pa
Md. Anwar Hossain
Sri Alok Kumar Sarkar
Arindam Mukherjee
Justice Arindam Mukherjee
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
