Disposed

Subrata Singha Alias Subrata Kr Singha and Anr. v. State of West Bengal and Ors.

Calcutta HC10 Feb 2021AST/13/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court, in a writ petition concerning proposed demolition, stayed adverse action pending the disposal of a representation filed by the petitioners, directing the District Collector to decide after a hearing.

What did the court decide?

The petitioners were granted protection from adverse action until the District Collector passes a reasoned decision on their representation after holding a hearing.

Subrata Singha Alias Subrata Kr Singha and Anr. Vs… — Writ and Judicial Review | Calcutta HC (2021)

¶1

AST 13 of 2021

¶2

10 .02 .2021 Item no. 9 Aloke Ct. no.38

¶3

(Through Video Conference)

¶4

Sri Subrata Singha @ Subrata Kr. Singha & Anr. Versus The State of West Bengal & Ors.

¶5

Mr. Kallol Mondal Mr. Srijib Chakraborty Mr. Krishan Ray Ms. Amrita Chel Mr. Souvik Das Mr. Anamitra Banerjee … for the petitioners Mr. Sougata Mitra … for the State

¶6

The petitioners say that they purchased 7 decimal of land through two purchased deeds. They have drawn my attention to such deeds. They have also drawn my attention to the municipal tax receipts and the khajna receipts which are in his name. This prima facie establishes that the petitioners are the owner of the land in question and he is in possession. The petitioners say that without initiating any proceeding against the petitioners either under the Highways Act or the Acquisition legislations or any other relevant statute, the PWD department suddenly came and marked a portion of the residential building of the petitioners standing on the land in question for the purpose of demolishing the same which the petitioners came to know from public announcements made in the locality. Hence, the

¶7

¶8

petitioners are before this Court by way of this writ petition.

¶9

Learned Advocate for the State in his usual fairness says that it is correct that no proceeding has been initiated by the State and without following due process of law the State cannot demolish the property of a citizen. He, however, points out that a representation dated February 1, 2021 (Annexure P-2 to the writ petition), has been made by the petitioners, addressed to various officials in the administration including the District Magistrate and District Collector, Paschim Medinipur, being the respondent no. 3. He submits that the said representation may be directed to be disposed of before any action can be taken by the State. I find the suggestion of learned counsel for the State to be fair and reasonable.

¶10

Accordingly, I direct the respondent no. 3 to take a reasoned decision on the representation dated February 1, 2021, made by the petitioners (Annexure P-2 to the writ petition), in accordance with law, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order along with a copy of the writ petition, after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioners or their authorized representative and any other concerned party. The decision so taken shall be communicated to the petitioners within a week from the date of the decision. It is made clear that no adverse

¶11

¶12

action will be taken against the petitioners or their property by the State administration before disposing of the aforesaid representation of the petitioners. In the event the decision of the respondent no. 3 goes against the petitioners, no effect will be given thereto for a fortnight from the date of service of a copy of such order on the petitioners.

¶13

I have not gone into the merits of the petitioners’ case. The respondent no. 3 shall take an informed decision in accordance with the applicable laws.

¶14

With the aforesaid direction, the writ petition is disposed of.

¶15

Since no affidavit has been called for, none of the allegations in the writ petition shall be deemed to have been admitted by the respondents.

¶16

(Arijit Banerjee, J.)

Subrata Singha Alias Subrata Kr Singha and Anr. v. State of West Bengal and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Subrata Singha Alias Subrata Kr Singha and Anr. v. State of West Bengal and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S Mangalam Express Cargo Pvt. Ltd. Vs Union of India

Subhra Ghosh Vs Smt Maya Ghosh and Ors.

Basab Dutta Vs the General Manager and 2 Others

Kamarhatty Company Limited Vs Kessels Engineering Pvt. Ltd.

Bimal Kumar Panja Vs State of West Bengal and Ors.

Pravapada Maji Vs State of West Bengal and Ors.