Petitioner admitted the writ petition was filed by mistake. The court dismissed the petition as not pressed and granted liberty to approach the appropriate forum.
Liberty to move the appropriate forum in accordance with law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
OD-1
W.P.O. No. 637 of 2019
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE (VIA VIDEO CONFERENCE)
RAVI SHAW
Versus
THE CESC LTD AND ORS.
BEFORE:
The Hon'ble JUSTICE AMRITA SINHA Date : 7th December, 2020.
Appearance : Mr. Mainak Swarnokar, Adv. …for the petitioner
Mr. Om Narayan Rai, Adv. Mr. Prashant Agarwal, Adv. …for CESC Ltd.
The Court: The learned Advocate appearing for the petitioner candidly submits that this writ has been filed by mistake and he prays leave to file the same before the appropriate forum.
On such submission the writ petition being W.P.O. No. 637 of 2019 stands dismissed as not pressed. Liberty to move the appropriate forum in accordance with law.
(AMRITA SINHA, J.)
S.Bag
RAVI SHAW
THE CESC LTD AND ORS.
AMRITA SINHA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
