Dismissed
Rina Sawoo and Anr. v. the State of West Bengal and Ors.
Calcutta HCWPO/148/2020
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Const. Writ dismissal for lack of active pursuit by petitioners.
What the court decided
AI extract
Const. Writ dismissal for lack of active pursuit by petitioners.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
ORDER SHEET
WPO 148 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE
RINA SAWOO AND ANR. VS.
THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS.
BEFORE:
The Hon’ble JUSTICE AMRITA SINHA Date: 21st December, 2020
Mr. Arunava Ghosh, Mr. Anindya Lahiri, Mr. Samrat Dey Paul, Advocates for the petitioners.
Mr. Saikat Banerjee, Ms. Juin Dutta Chakraborty, Advocates for the respondent.
The Court : The learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the
petitioners submits that his clients do not intend to pursue with the matter any further.
In view of the above submission, the writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed.
The written instruction given by the petitioners to their learned Advocate be retained with the records. The notice given by the learned Advocate for the respondent to the learned Advocate for the petitioners be also retained with the records.
( AMRITA SINHA, J.)
pa
Rina Sawoo and Anr.
The State of West Bengal & Ors.
Amrita Sinha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court